NY Appellate Court Paves the Way for Quarantine Camps in New York State

Well folks, the truth of the matter is that my quarantine camp lawsuit which I first started three long years ago has just reached its conclusion in the highest court in New York State.

TMR

The Morningstar Report

This article originally appeared in The Brownstone Journal and Bobby Cox’s Substack.

Governor Kathy Hochol Wants To Put a Stranglehold on All New Yorkers

This article originally appeared in The Brownstone Journnal and Bobby Cox’s substack. Click the link belo to read the origianl copy.

Brownstone » Brownstone Journal » Government

NY State High Court Paves the Way for Quarantine Camps

Appellate Court Paves the Way for Quarantine Camps in New York State

By Bobbie Anne Flower Cox

Bobbie Anne Flower Cox March 3, 2025 Government, Law, Public Health 15 minute read

SHARE | PRINT | EMAIL this link to your friends and family:

What is your first reaction to the title of this article? Shock? Disbelief? Skepticism? I’m sure many of you are thinking, But it’s 2025…We are 5 years out from the insanity of Covid-mania. And we have a new Administration in the White House…How on earth are you talking about “quarantine camps” now?

Well folks, the truth of the matter is that my quarantine camp lawsuit which I first started three long years ago has just reached its conclusion. The highest court in New York State, the Court of Appeals, issued its final ruling in the case…This panel of seven appointed judges is refusing to hear the case! That means the grossly erroneous intermediate appellate court’s ruling will stand, which in turn means that Governor Hochul and her dystopian New York State Department of Health are free to reissue their heinous quarantine camp regulation at will. Buckle up, New York!

This is a true travesty, not only for 19 million New Yorkers, but for all Americans. “How can that be?” you might ask. A little-known fact is that our federal government issued a quarantine camp regulation very similar to New York’s, and as far as I can tell, it was modeled on (and updated to its latest form after) New York’s! The only reporting I could find on this unbelievable fact is by Brownstone Institute founder and president, Jeffrey Tucker. His article, The CDC Planned Quarantine Camps Nationwide, tells the tale. Of course, the feds didn’t call it a “Quarantine Camp” regulation. (Nor did New York’s DOH). They always wrap the biggest lies up in candy, don’t they? The feds called it “the shielding approach,” and you can read more details about it on their website here.

Now that New York’s regulation is being left open for re-enactment, there’s no chance of using our onerous and lengthy legal battle as persuading precedence in a fight against the federal reg. In very simple terms and generally speaking, state courts do not have a binding effect on federal courts. Nor do federal courts have a binding effect on state courts, except for the United States Supreme Court.

That being said, there is such a thing called persuasive precedence. It’s when a court that is not subject to mandatory precedence considers the decision of a non-binding court even though it doesn’t have to. It’s akin to professional courtesy, but it also typically follows logic. For example, if the highest state court in Pennsylvania ruled that forced masking during Covid is illegal, it would be persuasive precedence for a state court in another state to rule accordingly. Now, this does not always happen, but it does happen often enough that it is a common stance in law.

Applying to the case at hand, after I’ve just gone through three years of costly and time-consuming litigation on New York State’s quarantine camp regulation, if I had a decision from our State’s highest court that upheld my trial court win, then that decision could have been used as persuasive precedence in a case against a different state’s (or the federal government’s) quarantine camp regulation. Something that I was considering at one point. However, that’s not how the game unfolded.

I explain…

Let’s begin with the reg itself. For those of you unfamiliar with my epic, David v. Goliath battle against New York State’s quest for ultimate control, you need to first understand what their quarantine camp regulation empowered the State to do. This excerpt from an article I wrote for the American Thinker back in June 2022 (before I won the initial lawsuit), paints a clear picture of the stunning atrocity that was the NYS “Isolation and Quarantine Procedures” regulation…

Imagine a land where the government has the power to lock you up because the unelected bureaucrats in the Health Department think that you might, possibly have a communicable disease. They don’t have to prove you are sick. They don’t have to prove you are a health threat to others. They just need to think that, maybe, you were possibly exposed to a disease. And when I say “lock people up,” I mean lock you in your home or force you from your home into a facility, detention center, camp (pick your noun) that they get to choose and you must stay there for however long they want. No time limit; so it could be for days, weeks, months, or years…

Now imagine that there is no age restriction, so the government can do this to you personally, or to your child, or to your grandchild, or to your elderly parent, or to your ailing grandparent. The nightmare continues because you have no recourse. No chance to prove that you aren’t actually infected with the disease. No chance to confront your jailers, see their supposed evidence against you or challenge their quarantine order in a court of law before getting locked up. And they can use law enforcement to help them carry out their forced quarantine or isolation orders, so the knock on your door could very well be the sheriff or police coming to remove you from your home or to “check in” on you to ensure you are locked down in your home, isolated, in accordance with the Health Department’s order against you.

This dystopian horror sounds unbelievable to an American. That the government has the ability to control one’s every move is unnatural to us. Politicians and bureaucrats being able to have unbridled power to tell you where you can and cannot go, what you can and cannot do, and who you can and cannot see is the very antithesis of what our country stands for. It flies in the face of “liberty and justice for all.” After all, we are supposed to be a nation of governance of the people, by the people, and for the people.

And yet, the governor of New York and her Department of Health have promulgated a dystopian regulation that does all of that and more. The regulation is called “Isolation and Quarantine Procedures” and can be found at 10 NYCRR 2.13. It is a clear violation of the Separation of Powers because the governor is not supposed to make law, nor can an agency. Only the legislature can make law and agencies can only issue regulations that the legislature empowers them to issue. Simply put, an agency cannot just make up rules on its own whim. It must have a directive from the legislature to do so.

Remember from grade-school History class: We have three branches of government (Judicial, Executive and Legislative), all are co-equal with one another, and each has its own separate powers and duties. The governor and her agencies are in the Executive Branch of government. The Executive Branch enforces the laws that the Legislative Branch passes.

But in this instance, the Executive Branch has usurped the power of the Legislative Branch by making this regulation, which is actually an impermissible law—despite the State calling it a “regulation.” The important fact is that there is no legislative enabling statute authorizing the Department of Health to make this “regulation”—not to mention the fact that the Executive Branch’s “regulation” violates numerous constitutional rights as well as New York State laws.

For those who feel we need to give the government the power to quarantine sick people who pose a threat to the public, I agree. However, that does not mean the government gets unbridled, unchecked, insanely unconstitutional powers. Case in point and more revealingly, we already have a quarantine law in New York State! We’ve had it since 1953, and it is full of due process protections, not the least of which is the fact that before the state can even contemplate quarantining you, they have to first prove you actually have a dangerous, communicable disease.

There is a litany of other due process protections in the law, which ultimately says that only a judge (after a hearing) has the power to quarantine you. This is in stark contrast to the authoritarian Quarantine Camp regulation that the DOH created which allows unelected, government employees (who are beholden to nobody except the politician in charge) to lock you up indefinitely, without any proof you’re sick. So folks, what we saw was a state agency overwriting a state law. Wholly unconstitutional.

So, when I became aware of this dystopian nightmare of a reg, after realizing that none of the so-called traditional “civil rights” organizations and none of the non-profit law firms with whom I spoke would touch it, I put my once very successful law practice aside, and I sued Governor Hochul and her DOH. I was interviewed back in 2022 by Jan Jekielek on American Thought Leaders, and that interview gives great detail about how and why I decided to give up my law practice I had spent 20 years building up, the adversities I faced, and the struggle it was to fight against the most corrupt state governments in our nation. That interview is here, and worth a watch for those who crave more insight.

My Quarantine Camp lawsuit was the first and only lawsuit of its kind in the country, and its importance could not be overstated. If the DOH’s “regulation” was allowed to stand, then it would signal to all agencies that they can make regulations that conflict with the Constitution and with state laws. If that happened, then the Legislative Branch of government would no longer be a co-equal branch. Instead, it would become subservient to the Executive Branch because the agencies in the Executive Branch could simply make a rule that conflicts with our laws (or the Constitution) whenever they wanted. It would render our laws useless. It would lead to unconditional tyranny, and it is We The People who suffer under a tyrannical regime.

After months of battling it out in the trial court, on July 8, 2022, NYS Supreme Court Judge Ronald Ploetz ruled that the “Isolation and Quarantine Procedures” regulation was unconstitutional and “violative of New York State law as promulgated and enacted, and therefore null, void and unenforceable as a matter of law.” The Judge also made note that, “[i]nvoluntary detention is a severe deprivation of individual liberty, far more egregious than other health safety measures, such as requiring mask wearing at certain venues. Involuntary quarantine may have far-reaching consequences such as loss of income (or employment) and isolation from family.” You can read the full decision here if you’re interested.

Because totalitarians don’t like to be told “no,” New York’s Governor, Kathy Hochul, and Attorney General, Letitia James, appealed the decision. Yes, that’s right…the Governor and AG, both unabashedly support insanely unconstitutional quarantine camps! Of course, the media would barely cover the story. Why would they paint the government in a bad light? Why would they report this obnoxious violation of our Constitution to the unsuspecting public?

Their refusal to do their civic duty meant that it was up to me to sound the alarm, so I reached out to my network of fabulous grassroots leaders and groups across the State, and with the especially notable help of one of my plaintiffs Uniting NYS, I crisscrossed the State raising awareness about the appeal. I did dozens of radio, podcast and TV interviews, and I wrote countless articles about it.

On September 13, 2023, over 400 of you showed up at the appellate courthouse to hear me argue the case against the AG. It was indeed historic, for never do people take a day off of work, flock by the hundreds, and cram into a courthouse to hear a couple of lawyers go at it in a courtroom devoid of witnesses, TV cameras, and all of the other pomp and circumstance that, for example, a high profile criminal trial might have. Not even in the movies, folks. It was a true testament to the freedom-loving citizens of a State that is wrought with corruption and greedy politicians on both sides of the aisle. You can watch the video of me arguing against the State here.

Photo by Emanphoto.com

Ultimately, the panel of five appointed judges disgracefully did what judges in corrupt, third-world countries do…they bowed to their political masters instead of upholding the Constitution with dignity and pride. The Fourth Department court reversed my trial court victory, and then dismissed the case! They dismissed, not because we were wrong in our arguments…no, no, indeed we were dead-right, and they knew it.

That is why the court did not even touch the merits of the case. Instead, the court copped out and used the age-old scapegoat ruling that my plaintiffs lack standing! In addition to the citizens’ group, Uniting NYS, my other plaintiffs were a group of NYS legislators, so of course they had standing to fight against a regulation that usurped their lawmaking power. Duh. But the court had the audacity to say that they didn’t have the right to sue! (Fun fact: One of my legislator plaintiffs is now a sitting United States Congressman, Mike Lawler, who is actively considering a run for governor. Wouldn’t that be a sublime case of poetic justice if Mike unseated Hochul!)

9/13/23 Press conference outside the Appellate Division Courthouse Photo by Emanphoto.com

I have done a deeper analysis of this nonsensical (some say corrupt) decision in prior articles which you can read here and here if you desire more color. But I will reiterate again now that their decision not only lacked logic, it lacked integrity, and it flew in the face of long-standing, binding case law from our highest court.

Disgraceful.

Not wanting to back down, in January 2024, I filed my appeal as of right, with the Court of Appeals which is our highest State court. As of right means the Court must hear my case, despite the fact that this Court does not hear all cases it receives. You see, according to NY rules, if a lawsuit has a constitutional question involved, our highest Court must hear the case. In May, that Court denied my appeal, saying there was no automatic right because the case, get this, had no constitutional issues! What?! A lawsuit about a regulation that breaches separation-of-powers and violates our Constitution doesn’t have a constitutional issue in question?

Disgraceful.

I was determined to fight to the end, so I didn’t stop there. My last hope was to file another motion with the Court, this time asking them to hear the case on their own volition, ya know, because it’s good for humanity and the integrity of this Court not to allow an agency to override our laws and throw people into camps without due process, etc. Sounds rather noble, doesn’t it? Well, not to an unnoble court, for last week they issued their decision…They refuse to hear the appeal. Period. Case closed.

Disgraceful.

And so, my three-year-long battle against the elitist Governor of New York (whose approval rating now hovers around 30%) and her lawless Department of Health, is over. The silver lining is that my victory of eliminating their heinous “Isolation and Quarantine Procedures” reg back in 2022, still stands today, despite the appellate court’s ruling. Here’s why…The reg was an “emergency” reg that the DOH was working to make permanent.

I knew I was under the gun to get the lawsuit drafted, filed, and fought before it became a permanent reg, so I basically abandoned my law practice for months on end in order to focus 100% on this lawsuit. As a result, I was able to move quickly enough to sue when the reg was still in an “emergency” phase. Since I successfully got it struck down before they could make it a permanent reg, the reg does not exist today. Amen.

However, thanks to the Court of Appeals allowing the Fourth Department’s decision to stand, the DOH is now free to reissue its dystopian reg. “Fire at will,” is what these courts have metaphorically told the Administrative State. There is nothing stopping the tyranny of the Executive Branch and its unconstitutional DOH now. Except perhaps a watchdog citizenry, if I can inspire, organize, and mobilize the masses.

Photo by Emanphoto.com

The Continuum…

If you follow my work on Substack or on X, you know that my quarantine camp lawsuit was just the tip of the iceberg. I started that battle in early 2022, by the end of 2022 and into 2023, I was working with Congressman Lee Zeldin (who had just run for Governor against, and almost defeated, Hochul), to prevent the unconstitutional gerrymandering of the Congressional lines in New York State by the Dems who 100% control the NYS government.

(Note: Republicans in the NYS Legislature are completely powerless in New York, regardless of the fact that Republicans now run both houses of Congress and the White House).

Congressman Zeldin, Congressman Lawler, City Councilman Borelli, Bobbie Anne Cox, Gerard Kassar, Congresswoman Maliotakis, City Councilman Holden

Congressman Zeldin and I, together with my newly formed organization, Stop NY Corruption, with help from other members of NY’s Congressional delegation, were ultimately successful in preventing that shameful political ploy to illegally retake the House of Representatives orchestrated, no doubt, by the DCCC. Reporter extraordinaire Jan Jekielek again covered the story on his popular show, American Thought Leaders. You can watch that interview here.

By the fall of 2023 and into 2024 I was on to a new project…I sued the NYS Legislature for their deceitful, anti-American “Prop 1,” which they oxymoronically called the “Equal Rights Amendment.” Prop 1 would change our NYS Constitution forever embedding in it a sinful shift of power from We The People to the government to do whatever they/it deems appropriate, in the supposed name of “equity and inclusion.”

Prop 1 abolishes women’s rights, women’s sports, single-sex anything and everything, it severely weakens parental rights, it empowers DEI and outlaws meritocracy, and it gives the government the power to discriminate against you in the name of preventing or reversing past discrimination! We won that case at the trial court level and Prop 1 was removed from the November ballot. But as is standard for elitist politicians, the Dems appealed the case, and the same pathetic Fourth Department reversed our victory at the trial court, and the same pathetic Court of Appeals refused to hear the case. (Are you seeing a trend?)

So in the spring of 2024, I teamed up again with Congressman Zeldin, and we, together with my organization, Vote NO on Prop One Committee, fought against the radical Dems that run NYS with their dishonest campaign to pass Prop 1. We came very close to defeating Prop 1, but it ultimately passed by 56% of the vote. My detailed analysis of what happened with Prop 1 can be accessed here.

Though the winds of change have taken hold in our nation’s capital, there will be no lasting change, nor will there be a change in New York State (and other blue states like it) unless we force those winds to remain permanent, and cajole them to descend upon our State. That is the next battle.

Indeed, I have faith.

*******

Republished from the author’s Substack

Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
For reprints, please set the canonical link back to the original Brownstone Institute Article and Author.

Author

• Bobbie Anne Flower Cox

  Bobbie Anne, a 2023 Brownstone Fellow, is an attorney with 25 years experience in the private sector, who continues to practice law but also lectures in her field of expertise - government over-reach and improper regulation and assessments.

  View all posts

Donate Today

Your financial backing of Brownstone Institute goes to support writers, lawyers, scientists, economists, and other people of courage who have been professionally purged and displaced during the upheaval of our times. You can help get the truth out through their ongoing work.

DONATE

Covid Response at Five Years: The Fourth Amendment

Covid Response at Five Years: The Fourth Amendment

Brownstone Institute March 4, 2025 Public Health, Society, Technology

Covid Response at Five Years: The Fourth Amendment

By Brownstone Institute - Public Health, Society, Technology 25

March 4, 2025

By April 2020, Americans were living in a regime of government surveillance that would have been previously unrecognizable. Politicians, newspapers, and activists touted a “Manhattan Project-level operation” aimed at enforcing lockdown orders via mass surveillance and house arrest orders.

While insisting their operations were in support of public health, they used familiar tracking programs that obliterated the safeguards of our Fourth Amendment. Silicon Valley forged lucrative partnerships with state and national governments, selling users’ habits and movements without their consent. Rather suddenly, supposedly free citizens were the subject of “track and trace” programs as if they were UPS packages.

“You never want a serious crisis to go to waste,” Rahm Emanuel famously remarked. “And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do before.” State actors and tech profiteers embraced Emanuel’s philosophy in the Covid response.

They took advantage of the nation’s fear to implement programs that abolished the Fourth Amendment.

Technology companies saw massive gains as they implemented a panopticon that allowed law enforcement to track any citizen in any place at any time. Coronamania was an opportunity to do things that they couldn’t do before, and the results were lucrative. The wealth of billionaires increased more in the first two years of the pandemic than it had in the previous 23 years combined, primarily due to gains in the tech sector.

Read Journal Article

Trump’s Ukraine Policy Changes the World Order

By Ramesh Thakur

Ramesh Thakur

Ramesh Thakur, a Brownstone Institute Senior Scholar, is a former United Nations Assistant Secretary-General, and emeritus professor in the Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University.

Ramesh Thakur / March 4, 2025

On 12 February, Trump talked to Russia’s President Vladimir Putin on the phone, and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth told NATO leaders in Brussels that the US would prioritise domestic concerns and the China threat over Ukraine. Vice President JD Vance’s tough love speech at the Munich Security Conference, the Marco Rubio delegation to Riyadh for peace talks with Russian counterparts sans a European and Ukrainian presence, and Trump’s Truth Social spray at Zelensky followed in quick succession.

The chief three-pronged attack line against Trump’s Ukraine pronouncements are that, in ‘a terrifying echo of the betrayal of Czechoslovakia in 1938’ (Antony Beevor, The Australian), they signal appeasement of Russia and betrayal of Ukraine. This will tempt China to grab Taiwan because the US security guarantee has lost all currency. Trump’s Truth Social spray at Zelensky was a signature mix of bombast, hyperbole, and braggadocio. Millions may not have died in the war but the combined casualties do run into hundreds of thousands. Ignoring the exaggerations and narcissism, I focus on four big issues.

First, Trump has already walked back his off-the-cuff false claim on TV that Ukraine started the war. Trump’s blast at Zelensky was more nuanced: the war ‘never had to start,’ it ‘couldn’t be won,’ and it cannot be ended without the US.

With President Donald Trump’s re-election and his well-known views, Europe and Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky faced an in-tray from hell. The interesting question is: Will this awaken Europe from its delusions? …

Read Journal Article

Covid Response at Five Years: Voting

Brownstone Institute / March 3, 2025

The liberalization of voting laws was integral to the pandemic response. This process was justified based on nonscientific grounds while invoking the cover of science. Then, the regime dedicated itself to destroying anyone who opposed its election manipulation. The disease did not cause the dramatic upheaval of the American system of voting; it was the fear of the result that shocked the country four years earlier.

In 1845, Congress established Election Day as the Tuesday after the first Monday of November in order “to establish a uniform time” for Americans to cast their ballots for president. Historically, voters needed to provide a valid reason – such as illness or military service – to qualify for absentee ballots.

But Covid served as a pretext to overturn that tradition. As the political actors used the guise of “public health” to amass political power in March 2020, the looming presidential election was the zenith of their aspirations. Just 25% of votes in 2020 occurred at the polls on Election Day. Mail-in voting more than doubled. Key swing states eliminated the need to provide a valid reason to cast absentee ballots. The virus and racial justice became justifications to disregard verification methods like signature requirements.

Rejection rates for absentee ballots plummeted by more than 80% in some states as the Covid regime welcomed an unprecedented increase in mail-in voting. Politicians and media outlets ignored rampant voter fraud in the months leading up to the election. They treated concerns surrounding absentee voting as obscure conspiracy theories despite a bipartisan commission describing it as “the largest source of potential voter fraud” just a decade earlier.

Read Journal Article

Covid Response at Five Years: Lockdowns

By Brownstone Institute / March 2, 2025

Beginning on March 16, 2020, nearly every state imposed “stay-at-home” orders. This totalitarianism was not reserved for brash political celebrities like Andrew Cuomo or Gavin Newsom. Supposedly moderate figures like…

Read Journal Article

*******

This article ws edited by Robert D. Morningstar,

Editor & Publisher of TMR & Morningstar News.NYC

*******

With Many Thanks to Bobbie Anne Flower Cox for her unwavring fight to affirm Constitutional Righs in New York State and to Ramesh Thakur and the Brownstone Institute for their their contributions to The Morningstar Report.

*******

Dear Friends & Supporters:

The Morningstar Report (TMR) is a Free News Report published by Robert D. Morningstar (RDM) to fight corporate and government corruption and to promote the public good.

Please become a “paid subscriber” or make a donation via PayPal or Global Peace Media (linked below).

We need your help to keep publishing The Morningstar Report (TMR) and and broadcasting “The Torrent of Truth” on Revolution Radio and Homenetwork.TV.

Please contribute by making a tax-deductible donation via Global Peace Media by clicking the link below

Click this link to donate through → Global Peace Media

You can also make a one-time (or recurring) contribution via PayPal, made to:

Robert D. Morningstar <robert.morningstar@gmail.com>

Email:→ robert.morningstar@gmail.com

Thank you for subscribing to The Morningstar Report

RDM

Robert D. Morningstar @ The Secret Space Program - Breakaway Civilization Conference in San Mateo, CA - June 7th, 2014

Tune in to hear The Morningstar Radio Report LIVE on Revolution Radio every Sunday at 3 pm Eastern on Studio A and on Mondays at 10 pm Eastern on Studio B.

@ → https://Revolution.Radio

or Click one of the links below:

Alternative Ways to Listen

Studio A Voscast - Sunday’s at 3 - 5 pm Eastern

Studio B Voscast - Mondays 10 pm -Midnight Eastern

Studio A ZenoFm - Sunday’s at 3 - 5 pm Eastern

Studio B ZenoFm - Mondays 10 pm -Midnight Eastern

The Morningstar Report is broadcast at 2p.m. Eastern every Monday thru Friday on Chicago’s WBOU 106.9 FM, as well as video netcast on Homnetwork.TV

-> Subscribe to Homenetwork TV Webpage - Register

Wishing a Golden Age to all our readers, contributors, patrons and supporters.